Memorandum for the Secretary of Health and Human Services the Commissioner of Food and Drugs

Published: Tue 9th Sep 25

This presidential memorandum addresses concerns about misleading direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertisements.

The memorandum directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Commissioner of Food and Drugs to enhance transparency and accuracy in such advertising by increasing the amount of risk information provided and by rigorously enforcing existing regulations.

The goal is to ensure that consumers receive fair, balanced, and complete information to make informed healthcare decisions.

Arguments For

  • Intended Benefit: Improved consumer understanding of prescription drug risks and benefits, leading to more informed healthcare decisions.

  • Evidence Cited: The memorandum cites the 1962 Congressional authority granted to the FDA to regulate prescription drug advertising and notes that current advertising practices may mislead consumers.

  • Implementation Methods: The memorandum directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Commissioner of Food and Drugs to take appropriate action to increase information about drug risks in advertisements and to enforce existing regulations for truthful and non-misleading advertising.

  • Legal/Historical Basis: The action is based on the 1962 legislation granting the FDA authority to regulate prescription drug advertising, aiming to uphold and clarify its intended purpose.

Arguments Against

  • Potential Impacts: Increased regulatory burden on pharmaceutical companies, potentially impacting the cost and availability of medications.

  • Implementation Challenges: Defining "materially complete" and "fairly balanced" information can be subjective, creating enforcement challenges. There may also be challenges in balancing consumer protection with free speech concerns.

  • Alternative Approaches: Alternative solutions could include educational campaigns targeting consumers, or incentivizing pharmaceutical companies to provide more complete information voluntarily.

  • Unintended Effects: Overly strict regulations could reduce drug advertising, limiting consumer awareness of available treatments. There's a potential for less effective communication of drug usage instructions.

SUBJECT: Addressing Misleading Direct-To-Consumer

Prescription Drug Advertisements

In 1962, the Congress vested the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) with the authority to regulate prescription drug advertising. These advertisements can mislead the public about the risks and benefits, encourage medications over lifestyle changes, inappropriately intervene in the physician-patient relationship, and advantage expensive drugs over cheaper generics.

The FDA has historically stipulated that a manufacturer, packer, or distributor must provide the public with materially complete information that fairly balances both the benefits and the risks of the drug. Over time, however, the FDA’s requirements have permitted drug companies to include less information, particularly in broadcast advertising, and drug manufacturer advertising has skyrocketed in recent decades.

My Administration will ensure that the current regulatory framework for drug advertising results in fair, balanced, and complete information for American consumers.

The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall therefore take appropriate action to ensure transparency and accuracy in direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising, including by increasing the amount of information regarding any risks associated with the use of any such prescription drug required to be provided in prescription drug advertisements, to the extent permitted by applicable law. The Commissioner of Food and Drugs shall take appropriate action to enforce the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act’s prescription drug advertising provisions, and otherwise ensure truthful and non-misleading information in direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertisements.

This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

DONALD J. TRUMP